User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  1
Likes Likes:  17
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 62
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Surrounded by grace, covered by love...
    Posts
    8,362
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    37

    Default Random political thoughts...

    (well, why not?)

    I'm sorry but to me Tea Party = League of White Decency lite. *smh*

    Living abroad? Thinking of moving, or just moved back? Check out the Expat Nappies group!

    Don't forget to THANK PANK!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Obamanation
    Posts
    6,777
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    25

    Default

    I agree and it's festering thoughout various aspects of society. @AK I remember your commenting about the woman who faked the acid throw to blame it on a black woman. The tea partiers would just take that and RUN with it... retaliating against random black women for nothing.

    I think that at this point more than ever we need to be mentally stronger as blacks.
    Quit tripping on what you're wearing on your behind and get some education in your head.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Brooklyn
    Posts
    4,893
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    25

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Metropolis.
    Posts
    4,666
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    I told my parents I might not vote for our city's new mayor because I don't know the candidate's platforms well enough (really, I'm lazy and don't feel like mailing the card off #kanyeshrug). I wonder if all this "vote or die" sentiment is silly. Is it really better to vote for someone you know nothing about than to not vote at all...hm.
    the artist formerly known as Electra


  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Metropolis.
    Posts
    4,666
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    19

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by masoesa View Post
    lol in yesterday's show he implied that it was immoderate to fear the tea partiers. I totally fear them. And I think I'm pretty moderate.
    the artist formerly known as Electra


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Philly! Philly!
    Posts
    3,452
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    I've never agreed with the idea of "vote or die" mentality. Black folks been votin' for awhile and we still dyin'...

    Yes, Black folks need to be mentally stronger...we need some very basic and guerilla-style political and historical education programs. Yeah. I need to get to planning...
    "To whom much is given much is required."

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Philly! Philly!
    Posts
    3,452
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    15

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by masoesa View Post
    This is interesting...

    But I don't think Black folks should take it down a notch...when whites are constantly taking it up notches...
    "To whom much is given much is required."

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Posts
    7,617
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    32

    Default Congressmen Seek To Lift Propaganda Ban

    An amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on American audiences is being inserted into the latest defense authorization bill, BuzzFeed has learned.

    The amendment would “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda material produced by the State Department and the Pentagon, according to the summary of the law at the House Rules Committee's official website.

    The tweak to the bill would essentially neutralize two previous acts—the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns.

    The bi-partisan amendment is sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry from Texas and Rep. Adam Smith from Washington State.

    In a little noticed press release earlier in the week — buried beneath the other high-profile issues in the $642 billion defense bill, including indefinite detention and a prohibition on gay marriage at military installations — Thornberry warned that in the Internet age, the current law “ties the hands of America’s diplomatic officials, military, and others by inhibiting our ability to effectively communicate in a credible way.”

    The bill's supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.

    Critics of the bill say there are ways to keep America safe without turning the massive information operations apparatus within the federal government against American citizens.

    “Clearly there are ways to modernize for the information age without wiping out the distinction between domestic and foreign audiences,” says Michael Shank, Vice President at the Institute for Economics and Peace in Washington D.C. "That Reps Adam Smith and Mac Thornberry want to roll back protections put in place by previously-serving Senators – who, in their wisdom, ensured limits to taxpayer–funded propaganda promulgated by the US government – is disconcerting and dangerous."

    “I just don’t want to see something this significant – whatever the pros and cons – go through without anyone noticing,”
    “ says one source on the Hill, who is disturbed by the law. According to this source, the law would allow "U.S. propaganda intended to influence foreign audiences to be used on the domestic population."

    The new law would give sweeping powers to the State Department and Pentagon to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public. “It removes the protection for Americans,” says a Pentagon official who is concerned about the law. “It removes oversight from the people who want to put out this information. There are no checks and balances. No one knows if the information is accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false.”

    According to this official, “senior public affairs” officers within the Department of Defense want to “get rid” of Smith-Mundt and other restrictions because it prevents information activities designed to prop up unpopular policies—like the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Critics of the bill point out that there was rigorous debate when Smith Mundt passed, and the fact that this is so “under the radar,” as the Pentagon official puts it, is troubling.

    The Pentagon spends some $4 billion a year to sway public opinion already, and it was recently revealed by USA Today the DoD spent $202 million on information operations in Iraq and Afghanistan last year.

    In an apparent retaliation to the USA Today investigation, the two reporters working on the story appear to have been targeted by Pentagon contractors, who created fake Facebook pages and Twitter accounts in an attempt to discredit them.

    (In fact, a second amendment to the authorization bill — in reaction to the USA Today report — seeks for cuts to the Pentagon’s propaganda budget overseas, while this amendment will make it easier for the propaganda to spread at home.)

    The evaporation of Smith-Mundt and other provisions to safeguard U.S. citizens against government propaganda campaigns is part of a larger trend within the diplomatic and military establishment.

    In December, the Pentagon used software to monitor the Twitter debate over Bradley Manning’s pre-trial hearing; another program being developed by the Pentagon would design software to create “sock puppets” on social media outlets; and, last year, General William Caldwell, deployed an information operations team under his command that had been trained in psychological operations to influence visiting American politicians to Kabul.

    The upshot, at times, is the Department of Defense using the same tools on U.S. citizens as on a hostile, foreign, population.

    A U.S. Army whistleblower, Lieutenant Col. Daniel Davis, noted recently in his scathing 84-page unclassified report on Afghanistan that there remains a strong desire within the defense establishment “to enable Public Affairs officers to influence American public opinion when they deem it necessary to "protect a key friendly center of gravity, to wit US national will," he wrote, quoting a well-regarded general.

    The defense bill passed the House Friday afternoon.
    2009: Transitioned
    2020: Mature, Freeformed Locs

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    3,154
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    13

    Default

    I'm laughing at Romney wanting Obama to apologize for his comments about his "business experience." I'm glad Obama hasn't apologized. Why the hell should he? Everyone else says all kinds of crazy sh.it about him and they're not expected to take back the things they say. Romney needs to shut up; if he can dish it, then he should learn how to swallow it and take it.
    Loc Updates! http://public.fotki.com/cher79/locs-part-2/

    Last chemical fire cream November 2002. I transitioned and clipped the remaining p.ermed ends in April 2004.

    Locs taken down and restarted. Twists put in 4/5/09.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    9,573
    Reviews
    Read 0 Reviews
    Post Thanks / Like
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Rep Power
    34

    Default

    I hate to think this but...if anyone has seen the show Scandal on ABC, does this sound familiar?

    Ann Romney Miscarriage Revealed In Recent Profile

    The timing of the announcement is just eerie. The campaign is losing women voters (like in Scandal) because of Akin. They choose now to tell this story???

    I'm sorry for her loss (if it's true).
    Last edited by chachadiva; 08-24-2012 at 02:50 AM.
    No one can make you feel inferior without your consent. -Eleanor Roosevelt

Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •